The chronicle of a Cairo Corridor is, certainly, one of the points at issue of the Second World War. Perhaps, any of military episodes was not interpreted so разноречиво - here again we face the same problems that Tolstoy, Zweig and other authors addressing to the biography of historic figures is no time. As a rule, historians-stimfaltsy interpret Cairo events as triumph of military genius Dzh. J. Cromwell, and historians-earth dwellers - as a failure of aggression and a celebration of the terrestrial defensive doctrine. Each of the parties results as proof numerous arguments, attestations of eyewitnesses, computer models and so on. The list of documentary acknowledgement of both points of view grows literally every year.
       However the unbiassed researcher always has on hand two незамутненных national and other predilections of a source. The first are Dates. At any different interpretations the comparative calendar of events is capable to clear very much and sometimes to throw light on the most confused questions, chronology falsification - the phenomenon in a modern historical science rare, and any similar attempt is in advance doomed presently to failure.